Article Text

Download PDFPDF
A Comparison Between Lidocaine Alone and Lidocaine With Meperidine for Continuous Spinal Anesthesia
  1. Pierre Maurette, M.D.*,
  2. Philippe Erny, M.D.,
  3. Gérard Bonada, M.D. and
  4. Veronique Djiane, M.D.
  1. From the Department of Anesthesiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Cedex, France.
  2. *Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology.
  3. Staff Specialist in Anesthesiology.
  4. Professor of Anesthesiology.
  1. Address correspondence and reprint requests to Pierre Maurette, M.D., Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Département d'Anesthésie 1, Hôpital Pellegrin, 33076 Bordeaux, Cedex, France.

Abstract

Background and Objectives. Experimental investigations have demonstrated a synergistic interaction between opioids and local anesthetics. This study aims to assess the effective benefit-risk ratio of continuous spinal anesthesia (CSA) induced with either 1.6% lidocaine alone or in combination with 1% meperidine.

Methods. Thirty-four elderly patients (80.7 ± 7.3 years) operated on for fracture of the neck of the femur were randomly allocated to two groups. In the first group ( n = 15), CSA was induced with lidocaine 1.6% plain, whereas in the second group ( n = 19) 1% meperidine was added. Reinjections were performed in both groups using lidocaine 1.6% alone.

Results. In the lidocaine group, 43 ± 13 mg was used for induction whereas in the other group the addition of 18 ± 5 mg of meperidine significantly reduced the dose of lidocaine required to 28 ± 8 mg ( p < 0.001). Delay between two reinjections was increased to 51 ± 7 minutes in the lidocaine plus meperidine group, compared to 35 ± 6 minutes in the lidocaine group ( p < 0.001). Ephedrine was required for 9 out of the 19 patients in the lidocaine plus meperidine group, whereas it was required for only two patients in the other group ( p = 0.05). Mean plasma concentrations of meperidine 1 hour and 3 hours after induction was 45.5 ± 12 ng/ml and 59 ± 22 ng/ml, respectively, and drowsiness was observed in 95% of the patients in the second group. Delay before requirement for pain medication was 2.2 ± 2 hours in the lidocaine group and 14.1 ± 8 hours in the lidocaine plus meperidine group ( p < 0.001).

Conclusions. The association of 1% meperidine with 1.6% lidocaine during the induction of CSA decreases the initial induction dose, prolongs analgesia, produces initial drowsiness, and provides long-lasting pain relief. However, such benefits are offset by some impairment of hemodynamic stability that is likely to make this combination of drugs unacceptable as an enhanced analgesic technique.

  • Anesthetics
  • opioid
  • meperidine
  • anesthetic techniques
  • continuous spinal
  • pharmacokinetics
  • meperidine
  • drug combination
  • lidocaine
  • meperidine.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Presented at the 1991 annual meeting of the American Society of Anesthesiology, in San Francisco, California, and at the 1991 annual meeting of the European Society of Regional Anesthesia in Athens, Greece.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.