You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Original Article
Hypotension in Spinal Anesthesia: A Comparison of Tetracaine and Bupivacaine
  1. H. H. Edström, PhD*,
  2. C. D. Blitt, MD†,
  3. E. M. Draper, MD‡,
  4. B. T. Manny, MD§ and
  5. S. R. Hameroff, MD
  1. From the Department of Anesthesia, University of Arizona Medical Center, Tucson, Arizona
  2. * Medical Department, Astra Läkemedel AB, Södertälje, Sweden.
  3. † Professor of Anesthesiology, currently in private practice with Old Pueblo Anesthesia, Tucson, Arizona.
  4. ‡ Private practice, Reno, Nevada.
  5. § Private practice, Reno, Nevada.
  6. Associate Professor of Anesthesia, University of Arizona Medical Center, Tucson, Arizona.

Abstract

Two spinal anesthetic formulations, bupivacaine 0.75% without dextrose (22.5 mg), and tetracaine, 0.5% in 5% dextrose (15 mg), were compared in a double-blind study of 60 patients undergoing orthopedic surgery. Injections were made with the patients in the lateral recumbent position after which they were turned supine and horizontal. A statistically significantly greater fall in mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure was found in the tetracaine group. Also, the maximum decrease in systolic blood pressure was statistically significantly more profound in the tetracaine group (24.7 ± 2.3%) than in the bupivacaine group (15.2 ± 1.7%). The mean upper level of analgesia at time for maximum decrease in systolic blood pressure was approximately T4 and T6. No differences were found between the groups with regard to changes in heart rate. One patient in the bupivacaine group developed postlumbar puncture headache.

  • Spinal anesthesia
  • Hypotension
  • Tetracaine
  • Bupivacaine

https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-00115550-198611030-00006

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.